🔗 Share this article

The latest departures of the BBC's director general and its news chief over claims of partiality have been characterized as an internal "coup" by a ex newspaper editor.

David Yelland, who previously edited the Sun newspaper from 1998 to 2003, stated during a radio program that the departures of Tim Davie and Deborah Turness followed systematic undermining by people associated with the corporation's leadership over an prolonged timeframe.

"It constituted a takeover, and worse than that, it represented an internal operation. There were people within the organization, very close to the leadership ... serving on the board, who have systematically undermined Tim Davie and his senior team over a period of [time] and this has been continuing for a long time. What occurred yesterday didn't just happen in vacuum," Yelland remarked.

Governance Breakdown Highlighted

"What has occurred here is there was a failure of governance. I don't blame the chairman [Samir Shah] as an person, but the role of the chair of any organization, a corporation – including the BBC – is to maintain their chief executive, their senior leader, in role or dismiss them. And that has failed to happen, because Tim Davie hadn't been fired. He stepped down and so there existed, that is the essence of, a breakdown of governance."

Context of Latest Dispute

The resignations on Sunday came after period of attacks from the U.S. administration and rightwing commentators in the UK that were prompted by allegations published by the Daily Telegraph.

The publication reported a leaked record of the conclusions of a former independent external adviser to its editorial guidelines panel, Michael Prescott, who left his role during the warmer months.

He had criticized the modification of a address by Donald Trump in an episode of Panorama, which he asserted made it seem that Trump had encouraged the US Capitol incident. Two portions of the address that were spliced together were delivered an sixty minutes apart, and the modification failed to mention that Trump had also said he wanted his followers to protest peacefully.

Internal Reactions and External Viewpoints

Yelland's criticisms echo a mood of dismay reported by sources within BBC News on Sunday night, with one saying: "It seems like a takeover. This represents the result of a campaign by political enemies of the BBC."

Different voices, encompassing Sky's previous political editor Adam Boulton, have claimed the overall impression that Trump egged on the event was fundamentally accurate. It is common practice to edit together segments of a lengthy speech to accurately condense it.

Handover Plans and Organizational Impact

Davie indicated his exit would not be immediate and that he was "managing" scheduling to guarantee an "smooth handover" over the coming months. Turness stated controversy around the Panorama edit had "arrived at a point where it is causing damage to the BBC – an organization that I value."

On Monday, the BBC journalist Nick Robinson revealed there had been inaction at the highest levels of the BBC because, while its experienced reporters desired to apologize for the editing error – but maintain there was "no plan to deceive" the viewers – the politically appointed directors preferred to go further.

Political Reaction and Broader Context

Shah is expected to apologize on Monday to the Parliament's culture, media and sport committee, and to supply additional information on the Panorama program in his reply to the panel, which had asked how he would address the concerns.

Commenting after the departures, the cabinet official Louise Sandher-Jones rejected claims the BBC was institutionally partial. The public service official stated Sky News: "When you look at the huge spectrum of domestic matters, local concerns, global issues, that it has to cover, I think its output is highly trusted. When I speak to individuals who've got firmly established opinions on those, they're still using the BBC for much of their news, it's shaping their views on this."