🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."